Assignment 3: STRATIFICATION Due: October 9, 1997 The objectives of stratification are to control the error in estimation by ensuring that samples are representative of the population; to ease administration of a survey by partitioning the task; and to provide separate and independant estimates in different parts of the population. The theory indicates that we will be successful in the first objective if our strata differ from each other but have units with little variation within each stratum. This observation leads to the idea of using knowledge of our population to group similar units together to for strata. In our case we are rather fortunate to have extensive knowledge of the characteristics of Stephens County in the tables and district map of Assignment 1. PROBLEMS 0. Append to this assignment your simulation study for the efficient stratification of Lockhart City. 1. Stratify the rural areas (districts 1-43) of Stephens County into 5 strata. We consider three designs for these areas: i. simple random sample, size 200 ii. stratified random sample, size 200 allocated proportionally iii. stratified random sample, size 200 using Neyman allocation The variable of interest is the average price a household is willing to pay for cable TV. 2. Using a process similar to the simulation exercise done in class, take 10 samples from each of designs i and ii. What is the design effect of design ii. 3. Compare the design effect for design ii in the rural areas with the design effect for the efficient stratification in Lockhart City. How are the effects of stratification in the two areas related to the SURVEY program assumptions. Pay special attention to the differences between the rural and urban areas of the county. 4. Neyman allocation requires knowledge of the variance of the study variable (the price a household is willing to pay for cable TV) within each stratum. We will use, instead, the assessed value of the household's living quarters as a surrogate variable to allocate the sample. The Stephen's County tax assessor will provide this assessed value for a charge of $1 per household. (This is much less than the billing charges for the rest of the SURVEY program.) This is done by providing the SURVEY program a list of addresses with negative district numbers; thus an address of -38, 112 will provide the assessment for household 112 in district 38. We have a $50 budget for sample design. Estimate the variance of household assessment in each of the five strata of problem 1 by using a sample of 10 households per stratum. Calculate a Neyman allocation. 5. Take 10 samples from design iii and calculate its design effect. Is Neyman allocation a substantial improvement over proportional allocation in this case? Under what circumstances can we expect Neyman allocation to be markedly better than proportional allocation? 6. Problem 3.30 in Sarndal et al. 7. Problem 3.39 in Sarndal et al.